2005年初曾在駐日大使館工作的江丙坤頻繁來往北京，獨立台灣會得知江丙坤將於四月初從北京返台，隨即動員宣傳車隊、人員去機場圍堵江丙坤抗議賣台之舉。然，後來傳出連戰預訂於四月二六日要前往北京，以史明的判斷，國民黨和中共已有在談判賣台問題。
故獨立台灣會動員地下人員監督連戰的行動，4月26自連戰走出家門，一路跟隨至桃園機場，在南崁交流道有獨立台灣會的七十輛的車隊及人員近百人，在49.5 k的地方堵到連戰的車隊達5、6分鐘，但遺憾的是被延途保護的警察車隊放行，有關此次的擋車事件台灣的報紙幾無報導。之後，我們的車隊馬上追至桃園機場，在三樓大廳看到黑衣人手持棍棒毆打台灣老人，手無寸鐵的獨立台灣會成員在史明帶領下，只有拿隨身携帶的鞭炮在機場威嚇黑衣人，也隨即被警察阻擋，我們即由旁邊門離開機場。
獨立台灣會原本計劃只要能夠阻擋連戰超過半小時以上的時間，定會成為國際新聞，讓國際社會知道台灣不是中國的，同時，不只是要阻擋連戰，更重要的是要告誡台灣人，連戰等國民黨人已和中共聯手，將出賣台灣的前途和利益。
426擋連事件以來，獨立台灣會只要有機會，就會對台灣人提出諫言，中國國民黨終會出賣台灣，但很遺憾的，只帶給台灣人若干的警惕，台灣人並沒能注意此事的嚴重性。
自二○○八年馬英九當選以來，我們可以看到馬英九企圖以香港模式，要將台灣置於被中共政權併吞的情境。
而在十月一日，中華民國的法院對四二六擋連事件做出判決，九十二歲的史明被判徒刑六個月及拘役五十天，黃敏紅判六個月及三個月，對此，我們對此判決提出嚴重的抗議，中華民國的法律不是台灣的法律，愛台灣無罪。
在中共的建國日十月一日做出判決，更讓我們更清楚的知道中華民國司法已受到行政的政治支配。台灣人要清楚的認知到中華民國不是台灣人的國家，唯有台灣實現獨立建國，才是台灣人唯一的活路。
2009-10-02
A Statement Regarding the April 26, 2005 Incident,
In Which the Taiwan Independence Association
Tried to Delay Lien Chan En Route
to the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport
In 2005, Chiang Pin-kun- the then KMT Vice Chairman, who also used to work at the Taiwan representative office in Japan- made many trips to Beijing. Since the Taiwan Independence Association (TIA) knew that Chiang was returning to Taiwan from Beijing on April 2nd, the Taiwan Independence Action motorcade went to the airport to “greet” Chiang with protests of his visits to Beijing, which they deemed were a betrayal of Taiwan.
Soon after Chiang’s return to Taiwan, there were rumors that Lien Chan would be going to Beijing on April 26. Su Beng’s assessment of this situation was that the Kuomintang (KMT) was about to sellout Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
So the Taiwan Independence Association’s underground network began surveilling Lien Chan’s every move. On April 26, from the moment that Lien stepped out of his house, members of the Taiwan Independence Association began following him to the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport. Lien was followed on the highway by about 100 people in 70 Taiwan Independence Association vehicles. After following him for 49.5 km on the highway, the Taiwan Independence Association was able to stop Lien’s vehicle for about 5 minutes. But because Lien had some police escorts with him, the police stopped the Taiwan Independence Association from blockading Lien’s vehicle. Even after the Taiwan Independence Association was not able to blockade Lien, they followed Lien to the airport. No newspapers in Taiwan reported this incident.
Once people from the TIA and Su Beng arrived at the airport and were on the third floor of the airport, they saw some people dressed in black using bats to beat up some old Taiwanese men who were at the airport protesting Lien’s visit to China. The people from the Taiwan Independence Association who were with Su Beng were not carrying any weapons with them, but they had some fireworks on them, so they set off the fireworks to scare away the men dressed in black. The police stopped the Taiwan Independence Association people, so then Su Beng and people from the TIA left through a side door.
The Taiwan Independence Association had tried to blockade Lien Chan on the highway en route to the airport, in hopes that if they could delay Lien by half an hour, it would make international news. In doing so, this would send an international message that Taiwan is not a part of China. Not only did the Taiwan Independence Association want to stop Lien Chan’s visit, but more importantly, they wanted to warn the Taiwanese people that Lien Chan, the KMT and CCP were all going to betray Taiwan.
Since the 4-26 incident, the Taiwan Independence Association has used every opportunity possible to warn the Taiwanese that the KMT would betray Taiwan. Though, some Taiwanese might be aware of this, most are not aware of the seriousness of this.
Since Ma Ying-jeou was elected President in 2008, we can see his intentions to follow Hong Kong’s model by selling out Taiwan to China.
On October 1, 2009, the Republic of China’s supreme court made a judgment regarding the 4-26 incident. They ordered 92-year-old Su Beng to serve 6 months and 50 days of detention for violations related to the incidents on April 2 and April 26, 2005. Su Beng’s assistant, Bin Hong has been ordered to serve 6 months, plus 3 months of detention for violations related to the incidents on April 2 and April 26, 2005. Su Beng and Bin Hong seriously object to this sentence. The ROC law is not the law of Taiwan. How can one be charged as guilty for loving Taiwan?
The judgment was announced on October 1, 2009, which is the 60th anniversary of the Peoples’ Republic of China. In doing so, the KMT is using this judgment as a tool to appease the Chinese Communist Party. The Taiwanese people should know that the ROC does not represent the country of Taiwan. Taiwan will survive only if Taiwan becomes independent.
