回首頁
回首頁
 


張瑜鳳被拔庭長 綠委質問標準何在?

判決王金平黨籍案勝訴的台北地院審判長張瑜鳳被拔除庭長職務,民進黨立法院黨團今天(20日)舉行記者會,抨擊這是政治清算,考評法官不適任的標準為何?為何在王金平上訴開庭前夕,張瑜鳳成為唯一「被拔掉庭長職務」的被審查人。

民進黨團幹事長蔡其昌指出,免兼庭長決定的背後因素並不單純,司法院必須向社會說清楚、講明白,否則國安會秘書長金溥聰將要掌握情治檢調的傳言,令人高度懷疑。希望這不是馬王鬥爭的三部曲,庭長任期審查委員會標準何在,必須更高透明。

法官出身的立委劉櫂豪表示,他與張瑜鳳是司法官訓練所同期學員,印象中張瑜鳳是認真負責的法官,媒體委司法界對她都有正面評價,但卻因承審一個眾所矚目案件,換來成為唯一被評為不適任的庭長,這樣巧合讓人高度懷疑背後政治操作,對長期司法不被信任下,對司法威信更產生疑問,司院有必要對外說明。

立委管碧玲指出,當到庭長得把過去審判的案件送審通過,怎麼會庭長被拔除的理由是裁判品質不佳?社會絕大多數都認為是衝著馬王鬥爭而來。她質疑,當場投票認為張不適任者,誰看過其裁判的品質?以什麼標準認定裁判品質不佳,應該對社會說明。

管碧玲質疑,為了服貿、自經區、馬習會,而要對王金平這麼大的威脅,相信這個動作是在恐嚇王金平,任何法官日後審到王金平的黨籍案,那個法官心中會有恐懼,這是張案所造成的直接效果,她呼籲司法要站起來。

立委尤美女指出,法院庭長任期調任辦法所規定的審查會成員,含司法院秘書長在內的5名當然委員均為官派,法官代表3人及學者專家代表1人是司法院人審會推薦,檢察官與律師代表也是由司法院院長決定,這種審查委員組成方式,自難杜絕人為運作的可能。

尤美女說,張瑜鳳事件讓人民對司法的信任再次破裂,因為有太多的巧合,除了剛好在王金平案上訴開庭前夕,而且所有34個連任庭長,唯獨王金平勝訴的張瑜鳳有問題。高等法院法官去考評不適任的標準為何?何謂不適任?司法院應該要講明白。

2014-06-20

民報 記者劉明堂

 

拔除北院庭長何張瑜鳳 民進黨批馬秋後算帳

民報 記者朱蒲青/台北報導 2014-06-20

去年9月政爭,曾判立法院長王金平確認黨籍存在案的台北地方法院庭長張瑜鳳,在司法院「庭長任期審查委員會」,被拔除庭長職務,只專任法官。民進黨發言人黃帝穎今(20)天表示,「這是9月政爭的延長賽,如果不是秋後算帳,什麼才是秋後算帳?」

黃帝潁說,針對一個庭長的免兼,必須要有法定的事由,司法院應該具體向社會清楚說明,何張瑜鳳不適任,必須免兼庭長。另一位黨發言人林俊憲則表示,現在換掉一審的庭長,難道這是一種暗示嗎?

黃帝穎認為,免兼庭長案也是干預二審判決,現在對一審的庭長做出處分,讓人懷疑是殺雞儆猴,意圖干預二審的審理,因此呼籲二審的法官,應該依法獨立審判,不要受到政治干預,對歷史與法律負責。

黃帝穎說,有關監委的提名,社會各界質疑,在上一屆監委袒護前檢察總長黃世銘,才獲得提名,而有自主意識的監委,就沒有獲馬總統提名,民進黨呼籲立法院應嚴格把關監委資格的審查,同時不該動用黨紀強迫國民黨籍立委行使監委同意權。

民進黨另一發言人林俊憲說,依照目前情勢來看,國民黨的9月政爭,顯然還在持續進行中,不聽話的監委全部都換掉,而判決王金平勝訴的庭長當然也要換掉,此舉顯示台灣民主大倒退,馬英九一直把民主掛在嘴上,但實際的政治操作是做一些秋後算帳、傷害民主的事,造成今日的恐怖氣氛。

 

秋後算帳?判王金平勝訴 庭長被拔掉職位 - 社會 - 自由時報電子報

According to the report by Liberty Times on June 19, 2014, the chief judge of the three judge panel presiding over the case of KMT vs Wang Jin-Pyng last year is removed her position as a chief judge at Taipei District Court. Judge Chang Yu-Fong, who issued a judgement in favor of Wang, was deemed unfit by a "Chief Judge Tenure Review Committee" of Depart of Justice by a 7-4 vote in a secret ballot on June 18, 2014. The removal reason against Judge Chang is listed as "Not Paying Enough Attention" in her handling of trial cases. This announcement triggers a wave of suspicion that KMT is flexing its muscle AGAIN against those judges who dare to rule against it. The timing of this announcement also causes concerns because KMT has appealed Chang's ruling and the new trial at Higher Court will start on June 20, 2014, just two days ahead of this removal announcement. It appears that a warning is now served to the new presiding judge panel at Higher Court for the upcoming case.

This is not the first time, a judge or a prosecutor is punished, demoted or removed from his/her position for apparent political reasons under Ma's administration. Almost all judges who acquitted President Chen of corruption charges were punished one way or the other. The prosecutor, Ho, who indicted Ma for embezzlement as Taipei Mayor was demoted and severely disciplined. On the other hand, those willing judicial accomplices were rewarded with big promotions.

However, Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Lin Jin-fang addresses the suspicion by claiming "no political considerations" in Chang's removal.

This judicial abuse by KMT does not escape the scrutinization of international observers. Taipei Times reports that, Jack Healey, founder of Human Rights Action Center, in his latest article on Huffington Post, said there is strong evidence of “political direction” in the way that prosecutors prioritized and pursued fraud charges against Chen and He also claims there were “enough deviations from accepted standards of fair judicial proceedings” to call into question the independence of the judiciary in Chen’s case.

In fact, not just Chen's case, the independence of the whole judicial system in Taiwan has long been criticized.

Jay Tu 2014-06-19

台灣e新聞